When we study Albert Einstein's theory of relativity we are studying motion on a light speed scale. Light speed is not just the relative velocity per second but equally relative to the distance. It travels just under 300 thousand km by the time we say "one thousand and one". This is the time we walk a meter, the second hand of analogue clocks and stop watches move a division and the pause in every second of digit time pieces. In fact light is always 300 thousand kilmeters ahead into the future of us every second.

The relative distance of the moon we observe the reflecting light a delay of a few seconds every second. Other factors tell us despite the zero resistance of space and light though of as weightless (no mass) is a maximum speed limit. It doesn't go any faster no doubt by the velocity so great it is weighed down to a point acceleration is terminated to a the maximum speed limit.

Einstein's theory comes in two papers the 1905 special theory and the General theory during the second year of world war one. The general was an after thought of the special, investigating variations of speed , twisting and turning that had morphed into the theory of the mass of stars and planets bending space derived from the special theory telling us motion has a G-force (Gravity forces) property we are all familiar with in high speed velocity. A case in point of an average family car.

They can generate 0 to 80kmph of G-force acceleration less than a few kilograms weighing us back into our seats in several seconds easily, powerful drag cars in less than a couple of seconds. A kilogram is not much just the weight we feel when we handle a1kg of cheese.

Rolla Casters generate it accelerating head long down hills and hitting tight bends with out slowing down. The twisting and turning motion at high velocity was the general idea of Einstein's general theory. As Rolla Coasters hit tight bends the cars attempt to obey Newton's laws of force and motion in a straight line. The end result is the weight we feel every time the car curves at high speed. The twisting and turning on a light speed scale is what gave cause for the general theory light speed scale G-forces distort space.

Einstein had in effect predicted the effect NASA has been using today using aircraft training astronauts in weightless. When a plane drops from high altitude at high speed it generates zero gravity where astronauts frolic about in weightless fun. In other words the motion of the aircraft becomes an antigravity device. If the plane climbs fast enough astronauts will feel as if a heavier gravity pulling them to the floor.

Einstein had predicted the implications if inertia at light speed. The special theory tells us we need more and more energy until we need an infinite amount to over come the resistance of the G-force. If a infinite amount of energy required for light speed is true, than at light speed has an infinite G-force property preventing light speed travel. And there is another special circumstance.

As Isaac Newton pointed out body's have a resistance to move called inertia. Einstein saw pushing the envelope a body to light speed would require and infinite amount of energy to over come the infinite amount of G-force pulling it back. The "G's" would certainly rival the gravitational filed of a black hole. After all, if light travels just under 300 thousand km/s ( or 10 thousand and 80 million kilometers per hour in kmph terms), so you can imagine the "G's" accelerating 0 to that velocity in a second. We don't have to be Einstein's to realize the implications.

Another factor involved with light speed any school physics class tells us compression heats. Just feel the heat of a bicycle pump when pumping air into a tire. It is not due to friction you know. You are compressing the air we breath into the confined space of the pump going into the tire. It is how diesel engines work as they rely on compression to ignite the fuel not petrol engine spark plugs.

At light speed velocity the G-force would compress the molecules crushing the body. The outer orbiting particles of the atoms (electrons) in each molecule would be pulled in closer to each other. Each part of the atom would become very heavy under the stress of the enormous G-force. Traveling towards light speed the body would get heavier and heavier and hotter and hotter from the pressure. The faster we go the more the atomic structure is crushed together. Sounds familiar to the gravitational field of collapsing matter reaching temperatures high enough to ignite into a star. Einstein pointed out in his special theory this G-force has the properties of distorting space and time the same properties developed the General theory as the mass of stars and planets.

The distortion of space effects length and time. We take for granted the second. Actually it is longer we think. It is by time we say we say "One thousand and one" the second hand of a clock moves a division, we walk a meter and light travels a distance of just under 300 thousand kilometers for example. This time we say "one thousand and one", tells us a 0 is the start of the second and 1 the end. As for the 2nd second is the start of the second and ends when the 3rd second starts. So for every second thereafter. Every time digital time piece second pauses or the second hand of a analogues clock moves a division is the length of time we say one thousand and one the end of every second is the start of another.

Operating on the principle we can slow time concentrating on observing the time delay of every digital time piece second and the movement of each division of analogue clock. I bet that would be the longest minute you'll ever site though.

By the time the second hand had moved a full circle the minute hand only moved a division Every second is 0 minuets. For example 12 midnight equals 00:00:00, and one second after 01:0:00 and count down to it is 00:1:0:00, the first minute of the first hour of the A.M). And too, when the minute hand of an analogue clock moves a full circle the hour hand had only moved a division.

From the point of view of the second hand the minute hand is 60 times as slow. With some math's statistics, shows the hour hand is 60 times as slow as as the minute hand, the hour hand 3 thousand 600 times as slow as the second hand respectively.

If we open out a analogue clock circle to a straight line the second is moving though a 60 division scale in a straight line every second or 60 in a minute. And too, we observe the minute and hour hand movement as frozen in time at any given moment. In other words they are to slow to observe moving. From the point of view point of the minute and hour hands they must observe us sped up in time by equal amounts all our activities.

In the general theory G-force on a light speed scale weight's heavily as a black hole. The only difference the gravitational filed of a black hole is stationary while light is motion. The slower we go the faster time goes for example if we observe the minute hand of a clock sped up we'd normally observe the second hand.

Operating on the principle the faster we travel the slower time goes to observe the environment's time to speed up, either the environment is traveling faster than us or we travel slower than the environment. Mathematics projects if we observe the minute hand sped up we'd normally observe the second hand since there are 60 seconds in a minute we would be 60 times as slow as every environment second. In other words the reciprocal tells we'd be traveling in parallel with 60th second dimension so from our point of view we observe every environment minute per second.

From the environment's point of view we would be stationary as statue in every minute. Clock faces point out as there is 60 minutes in an hour so environmental observers observing us as would see us move 60 times as slow as a second (a minute as slow) while we'd observe every environment second, a minute and every environment minute an hour into the future.

Particularly motor sport commentary commentators win and loose our motor sport heroes in less than a second. The standard metric system prefix units, mili (mill lee) for a thousandth and micro for a millionth is commonly used. The definition of the units tells us 0.75, (750 milliseconds) is three quarters, 0.66666.... .(666.6666.... milliseconds) is two thirds, 0.5, (500 milliseconds) is a half, 0.3333...... 333.33333.... milliseconds) is a third, 0.25 (250 milliseconds ) is a quarter respectively. Even smaller prefix units Nano- for a thousand millionth and pico- for a billionth is often encountered in science as small as several trillionths second. (A trillionths is an 18 decimal number). There are numbers as small as 25 decimal numbers of a second of time.

As every 12 midnight is a date change from one day to the next the hour hand moves two full circles one for A.M. and the other exactly the same amount of time for P.M. If we add up all the seconds amounts to 86 thousand 400 seconds. Every second starting at 0 second when the date changes to just before it change again is accounted for by both the second hand of analogue and digital time pieces. The reciprocal tells us every second is 86 thousand 400th of time of every date change.

If we observe the hour hand sped up we normally observe the second hand we'd be an hour as slow as the environment or 3 thousand 600 times as slow as the environment second observing the environment hour every second. Mathematics projects to observe a date change per second the hour hand makes a full circle every half second equal 2 by the time we" say one thousand a one" equal to being 86 thousand 400 times as slow as every environment second.

Mathematics projects If we add up all the seconds of a week (the first second 12 midnight Monday morning to the last 12 Midnight Sunday night) gives us the number of times as slow as the environment second we'd observe a environment week per second. Of course from the environment's point of view we'd be as still as a statue every week.

The same would apply to all the seconds of each month according to the western calendar. However if we take all the seconds of each date change multiplied by in a year will give us all the seconds of a year, from the first 12 midnight New years morning to the last 12 midnight new years eve. The same will apply if we take into account of the extra day at the end of every 4th February leap year, will apply for a decade. And so we can add up all the seconds of a century, a millennia (thousand years) a million, a billion, or even trillions of centuries respectively as slow as the environment second. With all said and done from one point of view a second stretched as long as a century and from the opposite point of view century compressed into a second respectively.

Our time frame is determined by the "time we say one thousand and one" determining from our point of view the distance light travels. Operating on the principle the information light takes just under eight minutes to reach earth from the sun, our sun is the nearest star eight light minutes away.

The law of mathematics' may sound confusing resulting in four equations if you can remember a light second times eight minutes equals the distance and eight minutes times the light second equals the distance. We can apply the distance dived a light second gives eight minutes and the distance divide the eight minutes equals the light second respectively. Mathematics can't lie you know. Distance equals light second, eight minutes, distance equals eight minutes, light second, equals distance over eight minutes and eight minutes equals distance over light second.

Light has been traveling the universe since the first light from the first second of the big bang that has supposed to have created the universe. So far, granted the earth traveling in motion though space, the first light is still traveling lighting up a path in a black void of empty space just under 15 billion years ahead of earth's position.

If we traveler quarter light speed we should be traveling quarter closer to it. At half, we would be half closer. If we travel three quarters we'd be three quarters closer. If we where 90 percent light we'd be 90 percent closer. Current thinking tells us no matter how much closer we are to light speed light would always be the exact light speed ahead of us every second.

Consider if we to resort to some math's commutations a quarter light speed light would be 750 thousand km/s ahead of us every second. If half light speed would be 150 thousand. If three quarters would be 225 thousand km/s. If 90 percent light speed would be 30 thousand km/s ahead of us. Math's doesn't lie only our current thinking disagrees.

Consider for example if we were at light speed. Theoretically we would be traveling in parallel with it. Mathematically light speed is no (or 0) km/s. Our current thinking light speed is a constant should not change suggesting it should appear to look stationary to us. If we were to stick to our current idea light is always ahead of us by light speed no matter how fast we travel says light would be the same velocity ahead of us every second. To agree mathematically traveling 300 thousand km/s light speed would need to be a total 600 thousand km/s. Otherwise light speed we would never reach beyond in parallel with it.

Mathematically speaking tells us if light is a a light second head of us every second then it stands to reason the distance in every second. At a quarter, half, 3 quarters or 90 percent light speed we close those distances in each second.

So if on light speed from our point of view at lest would be traveling 0 meters relative to us. Country to the belief the faster we go the slower time goes we should observe the universe travel at light speed. But from the the universe's point of view we would be traveling at a light speed velocity though space and time. From our point of view equally the universe country to looking slowed down in time.

If the faster we go the slower times slows down is true we may think we'd observe the universe slowed down by the same amount as the light speed value we'd normally observe light speed. For example mathematics tells us means if we apply the reciprocal translates to observing the universe 300 thousand seconds to travel a distance of 300 thousand km. If we do the math's on this from a light speed point of view the universe should appear to take a good proportion of a long weekend to cover the same distance we'd normally observe in a second or 3 thousand km/s.

But as Einstein's special theory tells us distance is compressed the faster we go. If light speed is a constant as it is believed to be has to be directly related to the faster we go the less distance to light's maximum limit. The closer and closer we get the more the distance is compressed up against the unchanged constant until we are traveling the same speed where there should be zero meters.

In other words we will be squeezed by the pressure of the closed distance every second. The G-force at light at speed is at maximum. Catching up with the constant flies in the face of no matter how fast we go light is always ahead of us were we can never catch up with it.

If on the other hand as we move closer to light speed's constant, we would experience the pressure of the continues compression. Every molecule would be compressed together with building heat. In many respects like being crushed falling into the boundary the void of a black hole. (Event horizon ) The closer we go the more the distance is closed the more compressed and hotter the body becomes. Operating on the principle the second would be totally squeezed to the value of light speed. In other words the distance of 300 thousand km and 1 second compressed by a factor of 300 thousand times.

The circumstance we don't feel the impact light slamming into us at just under 300.000km/s assumes has to be weightless. It must have no mass. In Quantum physics it quantum leaps or tunnels though space disappearing and reappearing on Planck scale. (?) A Planck scale is a Planck constant, a 43 number, 36 zeros 6626068.


Such a huge number like that is a scientific notation of 6 point 62068 times ten to the minus 43. (6626068 x 10-43), the minus value. The reciprocal tells us the same number of zeros on the right of same number in the positive value. In other words 6 point 626068 times ten to the 43 (6.626068 x 1043). Mathematics tells us one dived the minus value gives us the positive value and one divide the positive value gives us minus value. In other words are reciprocals of each other.

It was announced in 1900 by a German physicist claming a mathematical constant. matter, mass, energy, length and time come in bursts rather than infinitely smooth he called Quota. The constant is universal, in the minus value defining a Planck length, a Planck second, a Planck energy and a Planck mass while in the positive value mass on a Planck scale a 40 digit number kilotons or 43 in kilograms force of gravity. The disappearing and reappearing act is expressed as a Quantum leap, a Planck length in Planck second. Every particle, a Photon, appears and disappears in the minus value of a meter and the positive value per second.

Ever since the ancient Greets discovered the geometry of a circle mathematicians have never been able to find the end of pi. It is a never ending number. But Planck's constant ends at 43 digits conveniently doing away with infinite. That is what physicists like about Planck's constant.

Classical physics describes the universe full of radiation radiating from the trillions of galaxies quantum physics telling us operates on a Planck scale. This radiation is a back and forth oscillating motion many times per second. A pendulum swing for example accelerates and slows down to a stop at a maximum distance. It reaccelerates in the reverse direction slowing down to a stop the opposite distance repeating the cycle.

The unit of a cycle per second is Hertz describing the frequency. The mains electric power for example is a 60Hz constant. The standard metric system prefixes, Kilo for a thousand, mega for a million, giga for a thousand million and tetra for a billion familiarly seem radio and television, telecommunication and radar, internet transition, computer speed and cosmic radiation notation. (Hz, KHz, MHz, GHz, and THz respectively).

The reciprocal of the frequency (One divide the frequency value) gives the wavelength in millimeters. The mains for example is 0.01666666 (1.6 x 10-2) the minus value of a meter or 16mm. In other words, 60th second equals 16mm in 16 milliseconds. The law of mathematics tells us 60 times 16mm or 60 times 16ms equals one second.

A typical school ruler will measure the width of a typical ball point pen line a millimeter. The thickness of a typical news paper sheet is about a micrometer (a millionth) minus value of a meter and second (1 x 10-6), nano- for a thousand millionth (10-9), and pico- a billionth (10-12) and so on. In other words for every positive value, there is the minus value and for every minus value there is the positive value respectively simply by one divide the frequency or one divide the wavelength.

Quantum physics tells us the mains on a Planck scale, the osculating electrons, (the outer orbiting particles of the atom) are quantum jumping a Planck length in the minus value in the positive value times per second throughout the entire one cycle including cosmic radiation.

Visible light includes all the colors of the rainbow only a tiny fraction of the total cosmic spectrum. The longest wavelength we can see is red no longer than a little under a micrometer. The shortest is violet (a relative purple blue) the wavelength no longer than a few nanometers.

If a wavelength of the color red becomes longer it disappears into what is familiar to us as inferred only inferred cameras can see. In fact known as heat radiation. For example a inferred camera will show up a freshly solidified lava flow in the pitch black of night we don't see with the naked eye. The same is true for the radiating warmth of a freshly put out camp fire patch. Anything alive with a beating heart in a pitch blackness of dark nights inferred cameras easily see.

Still less than a micrometer are the commercial radio and television station, telecommunication, internet, and radar band transition signals. Cosmologists believe wavelengths longer than a millimeter up to a maximum of a kilometer is the dampened remains of the of the big bang that has supposed to have created the universe.

On the other end of the visible light spectrum when we observe violet's wavelength any shorter (less than a micrometer) like inferred it too becomes invisible the familiar Ultra Violet light (UV) rays from the sun that tans our bodies in the summer months. X-rays is the next shortest while the shortest of all in the nanometer scale are Gamma rays produced in the heart of stars and nuclear physics

Mathematicians had come across a problem with math's that there should be an infinite range of wavelengths. For example a molten lava flow should emit the entire range including way way beyond gamma rays. The trouble is even a small camp fire should have incinerated the world years ago expressed as the ultra violet light catastrophe. The Ultra High frequency of gamma Rays and the remains of the big bang radio waves seems to be the to extreme maximums. They cannot be any longer than a kilometer or any shorter than a picometer.

Away from a gravity source cosmic radiation travels at the speed of light. When it enterers the earth's gravity and atmosphere the velocity is slow down and the wavelengths stretched. By the time the most of it reaches the ground is UV and inferred wavelengths. Water, glass and prisms stretch and slows it down further. Solid objects stop it dead in it's tracks. It reverses direction accelerating back though the earth's atmosphere. Once clear it intermediately accelerates to light speed again all this in less than a couple of seconds.

Despite the fact there is a zero resistance in space and the cosmic radiation being weightless is at maximum momentum speed limit. It can't go any faster. In fact it travels 300,000km distance by the time say one thousand and one..

In fact saying one thousand and one as we walk we can become pretty good at judging we walk a meter in a second. If we do the math's on this we take an hour to walk a distance of 3,600 meters or 3.6km. In other words a 3.6kmph velocity.

Operating on the principle using the time we say one thousand reference the time we walk a meter the radiation had traveled a distance of 300 million meters. (Or in kilometers 300,000). Mathematics tells us the reciprocal tells us 300,000th second per meter. Operating on the principle the reciprocal tells us the cosmic radiation travels 300,00th second per meter.

In the standard metric system prefix context 3 microseconds per meter the reciprocal tells us 300 million a second. As far as a Quantum leap is concerned each leap the Planck constant in the minus value of a meter and the number of times in a second the same Planck constant in the positive value. Imagine a computer speed on a Planck scale. In terms of our current GHz, we would have 6.626068 x 1036 ( a total 36 digit number processing power). A trillion GHz processing power is only 1 x 1018. In terms of frequency Planck's constant makes a quantum leap a mind boggling faster than light speed.

Once again mathematics tells us the reciprocal tells us the radiation is 300,000 times as fast as our environment second. In other words we are viewing it at sub light speed always 300,000km distance into the future every second. In 1905 Albert Einstein's wrote a paper on the dynamics of motion on a light speed scale these days known as the special theory of reality because of the special circumstances of a unified constant motion.

0 to 80km (50mph) in a few seconds n the surface of earth is quite an impressive. But a body lunched in space will travel several tens of thousand kmph obeying Isaac Newtown's first law once set in motion (in the case of the zero resistance) will continue in that straight line motion indefinitely. This does not mean it is accelerating indefinitely. There is a maximum constant momentum speed limit. In other words a body lunched from a space station the initial acceleration is terminated to a constant momentum speed limit where it can't go any faster.

Imagine 0 to 160kmp (100mph) in a second on the surface of earth. The acceleration in space will appear to have no effect let a lone several tens of kmph. Never the less lets have a look at what happens to time when we accelerate and decelerate to a stop in a distance of 160km in a second on the surface of earth. As we take off we would be reaching 80km distance in half second and equally decelerating to a stop in another 80km distance in another half second.

As we take off we would probably observe the environment's time slowly slow down, slowly at first getting faster and faster and the environment getting narrower and narrower in volume as time slows down then appear to slowly speed back up a bit slowly at first getting faster and faster as the environment's volume gets wider and wider and stop all together when at normal time. We'd find our selves chocking and spluttering getting over the the distortion of the air we breath effect on us. We'd be a 160km away a second into the future from where we began. Environment observes would probably view us as a stretchy rubber band stretch a 160km distance snapping back to normal by the time they could say one thousand and one.

If we are to reach light speed velocity we have to accelerate from our sub light speed first. If we increase speed we are accelerating our sub light speed. Because light is a constant the distance won't change. All we'd be doing is changing a new distance light travels from our new velocity point of view. Lets see how this happens with few examples.

We would observe light speed not any further than a distance of 300,000km no matter how long the environment's time appeared to be. If we were to increase speed the radiation velocity won't change only us.

If we are to observe the minute hand of a clock speed up as fast as we normally observe the second hand the clock for example mathematics projects the clock would have to be traveling though time 60 times faster than us. Or to put it anther way, we would have to be traveling 60 times as slow as the environment second. The environment would see us as 60times as slow. In other words we would observe the environment minute every second.

The same math's applies if we observed the hour hand speed up as fast as we normally view the second hand. Doing the math's we would be 3,600 times as slow as every environment second. For every second an environment hour, we would be an hour into the future every second.

The same would apply if we view an environment day, week, month, a year, a decade, a century, a millennia (thousand years), a million, billions of years, even a trillions of centuries per second. From the environment's point of view we would be slowed down in time proportion.

This is what every park statue would observe of it's environmental time. A trillion centuries would appear a moment. If we were slow down enough stating at the supposed big bang we would observe the age of the universe 15 billion years ago, the earth formed only a few 100 million years latter. Dinosaurs roaming the earth few million the beginning of the last great ice few 100,000 years ago ending about 10,000 years, all of man's history to this day in a second.

If we are to observe the minute hand of a clock speed up as fast as we normally observe the second hand the clock for example mathematics projects the clock would have to be traveling though time 60 times faster than us. Or to put it anther way, we would have to be traveling 60 times as slow as the environment second. The environment would see us as 60times as slow. In other words we would observe the environment minute every second.

The same math's applies if we observed the hour hand speed up as fast as we normally view the second hand. Doing the math's we would be 3,600 times as slow as every environment second. For every second an environment hour, we would be an hour into the future every second.

The same would apply if we view an environment day, week, month, a year, a decade, a century, a millennia (thousand years), a million, billions of years, even a trillions of centuries per second. From the environment's point of view we would be slowed down in time proportion.

This is what every park statue would observe time. A trillion environment centuries would appear a moment of time. If we were to slow down enough we would observe the age of the universe begin under 15 billion years ago, the earth formed only a few 100 billion. Dinosaurs few million the beginning of the last great ice few 100,000 years ago ending about 10,000 years, all of man's history to this day in less than a second.

If we are to observe the minute hand of a clock speed up as fast as we normally observe the second hand the clock for example mathematics projects the clock would have to be traveling though time 60 times faster than us. Or to put it anther way, we would have to be traveling 60 times as slow as the environment second. The environment would see us as 60times as slow. In other words we would observe the environment minute every second.

The same math's applies only in reverse perspective point of view between us and the observe environment if we observed the second move as slow as we normally view the minute hand. Doing the math's we would be 60 times as fast as every environment second. Every environment second would appear to be as slow as a minute.

The same would apply if we view an environment's second as long as a day, a week, a month, a year, a decade, a century, a millennia (thousand years), a million, billions of years, even a trillions of centuries. From the environment's point of view we would be traveling in time ahead into the future proportionately.

This is what we observe of every park statue. We would observe them a couple of years of time. If we were to speed up an hour into future we would observe every environment day as appear to be an so slow it would appear a agonizingly infinite amount of time let a long a day or a week.

If we observed the second hand slowed down we'd normally observe the minute hand either the clock is 60 times as slow as the environment's second or we are 60 times as fast as the environment's second.

Because light speed is a fixed maximum constant the faster we go the closer we are to it. For example if we wanted to travel up to half light speed goal we would need to double our the current sub light speed limit. We would be twice as fast as the universe by a 150,000km/s. Mathematics puts light a 150,000km ahead of us every second the equivalent of viewing the universe travel a second slower than our normal sub light speed. In other words the universe would be viewed as slowed down 300,000km per 2 seconds. We also observe the universe seem to squashed in proportion as if squeezed to fit into half the dimension.

If we tried three quarters goal light would be 75,000km ahead of us every second or 4 seconds slower than our current sub light speed. ( The universe would appear to travel 300,000km per 4 seconds).

If we travel at light speed we'd be in parallel with it. Mathematics projects light is no longer ahead of us every second. In such a case we'd think we would view the universe travel 300,000km/s light zero ahead of us. If we rethink the characteristics of light it may not work out like that. What would we see traveling in parallel with light speed? For a start it is the entire cosmic radiation spectrum as waveform of many different wavelengths, or more appropriately Quantum jumping on a Planck scale.

Classical physics tells us each wavelength is like a pendulum swing. With a pencil tip on a stationary piece of paper will draw a straight back and forth on itself indefinitely. As soon as the paper moves (lets say by a 1cm a second) will draw a sine waveform where the laws of geometry are often applied.

When the paper is moving the sin wave is longitudinal. When not moving swing pendulum draw a representation of a standing wave. All this is academic since I had neglected the compression of the dimension not to mention the stress of light of a speed scale.