Saturday, October 4, 2014

Light speed, star treck, voyager, Enterprise, Albert Eistien's thoeory of reality

What if it is possible to accelerate from zero to a hundred and sixty kilometers ( or a hundred miles if you like ) in a second? What would it be like?  If we do the math's on this pans out to experiencing a three thousand six hundred thousand kilometres an hour stationary take off velocity. If we do the arithmetic tells us  a hundred and sixty kilometer a second covers a distance of three thousand,  six hundred,  thousand kilometers by the time a one hour TV program. A hundred and sixty kilometers per second equals three,  thousand,  six.  hundred thousand kilometers per our.

Imagine at light speed. If we do the arithmetic light traveling at just under three hundred thousand kilometers per second pans out to ten thousand and eighty million kilometer per hour velocity. Would Albert Einstein's special theory of reality apply at an acceleration of  0 to a stop in a distance of a hundred and sixty kilometers? ( or a hundred miles if you like ) in a second?

The original, next generation and Voyager TV series Star trek opening themes are probably the closest to a visual representation of what an observer would observe at take off. The Enterprises and voyager  took off from virtually a standing start to light speed in a second stretching forward like a rubber band the backs snapping into it disappearing into infinity.

In out of space there is no air resistance. Three hundred and sixty thousand kilometers per hour ( or a hundred and sixty kilometers per second ) has no effect on a body. On the surface of earth the immediate air molecules we breath in front of the body would be compressed into the  air molecules several meters ahead and in turn compressed into the air molecules several hundreds of meters ahead in shock wave traveling several kilometers ahead of it by the time it covered a hundred and sixty kilometers from standing start in the second. We would hear the shock of the explosion like the loudest thunder explosion we ever herd many kilometers away well above the loudness of a roaring jet engine a meter or so above our head.

The heat we feel pumping air in a tire with a bicycle pump is not from friction you know. It is from air compressed in the pump testifying to the fact compression produces heat. Diesel engines is another example as compression because it is  their basic fundamental. In other words the compressing molecules ahead of the traveling body produces heat. If incoming meteorites ( shooting stars ) in the earth's atmosphere is anything to go by what a body traveling a hundred and sixty kilometers per second velocity in the earth's atmosphere would look like.

Shooting stars get up to a few hundred thousand degrees. It is common they detonate in an explosion before hitting the ground. The molecules ahead of the falling rock become so compressed become like hitting solid ground in mid air to the falling métier.

In out of space there is no air pressure to compress. A hundred and sixty kilometer per second ( three hundred and sixty thousand kilometer per hour ) velocity is not felt as motion. On the surface of an airless body like the moon a meter per second ( three point six kilometer per hour ) is felt as motion. The stronger the gravity velocities less than a kilometer per hour is felt as motion. In other words extremely low velocities are felt in gravitational fields while extremely high motion is not felt in zero gravity.

On the surface of earth we feel a weight pushing us back at sixteen meters per second, ( a hundred and sixty kilometers per hour. or a hundred miles an hour if you like ) velocity. The math's tells us in other words a hundred and sixty kilometer per hour take off is a equivalent  sixteen meters in a second take off. We feel a weight pushing us back expressed as a G-force in a straight line we expresses as G's. It is testimony  to Albert Einstein's production in the special theory of reality of a gravitational equivalence.

Using a mathematical reference a G is the normal force of the earth's gravity nine point eight Newton's to be exact, equivalent to a kilogram per square centimeter ( or pounds per square in if you like ) of gravity per cubic meter pressing the earth's surface. Open space meteorite venialities on the surface of earth are as much as several tones of G's we don't feel in space. In other words motion in gravity produces G's.

Can we accelerate a hundred and sixty kilometers to a stop in a second on the earth's suffice? Will we experience Einstein's special theory of reality of time dilution during both acceleration and deceleration?

looking from the observers point of view of superman it would be a case of stationary at the starting point and stationary a hundred and sixty kilometers away in a second. In other words disappears and reapers a hundred sixty kilometers away in a second. Or will he appear like the Enterprise and voyager stretch a hundred and sixty kilometers long and snap back to normal a hundred and sixty kilometers away in the second?

Mathematics tells us 0 to a hundred and sixty kilometers to a stop in a second superman would have to accelerate to eighty kilometers ( or fifty miles ) in half environment second and decelerate to a stop another eighty kilometers in another half second  to equal a hundred and sixty kilometers in a whole second.   What would it be like from his point of view? Here's what I think Einstein's special theory would tell us.

Superman should observe the initial acceleration change the environment's time notably slowing down because he is speeding up. If we do the math's on this using a second he would be perceiving the environment's second stretching longer and longer in time. He would observe obverses getting slower and slower. It may happen happen slowly at first. As the acceleration gets faster and faster the environment's second gets longer and longer in time.

Finally at the turning point where he applies the brakes. It may be a point the environment's second is to slow for superman to observe moving any more. The observers my look frozen in time.

Analogue wall clocks testifies to this. Analogue is referenced because of so much computerized digital technology theses days. We can observe the second hand move every division round the clock face. It is the time we say one thousand and one, we walk a meter in a a second the same time light travels a distance of three hundred thousand kilometers in open space defining a light second of time. 

The standard metric system tells us there is a thousand meters in a kilometer and the math's tells us there is three million meters in three hundred thousand kilometers. This means by the time we walk a meter in a second light had traveled three million meters the same amount of time the second hand of a analogue clock moved a division. In digital time pieces the second change the same amount of time too. Every second on the surface of earth is a light second, the distance light travels that same amount time.

By the time we observe the second hand move a whole circle we don't observe the minute move when it moved a division. To us it  is frozen in time while moving a division. We don't observe the minute a full circle when the hour hand is frozen in time  moving moving a division. Both the minute and hour hands are not moving at any given moment of time because the are moving far too slow for us to observe moving.

Analogue clocks tells us there is sixty second in a minute. Digital time pieces aggress, the second hand counting to fifty nine changing to double zero at the sixtieth second the first second of the next minute. Both analogue and digital time pieces tell us tells us there is sixty minutes and the math's tells us three thousand six hundred seconds in an hour.

Mathematics tells us the hour hand is sixty times as slow as a minute and three thousand six hundred times as slow as a second. A whole day is a date change of the calendar every twelve midnight. It is equal to twenty three hours fifty nine minutes fifty nine seconds that changes the date to zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero remaining there the time a light second. If we do the arithmetic on this tells us every second is eighty six thousand four hundredth of this period ( Or a day if you like ) or the latter times as slow as a second. We observe the minute and hour hands not moving  moving round the face of a analogue clock every second of the whole day.

Mathematics tells us the geometry of a day the minute and hour of a analogue clock hands are frozen in time every second of the moving second hand of the whole day. In retrospect from the minute hand point of view observes us speed up by a minute of time. ( Or see's us moving sixty times as fast. ). So too the hour hand. It see's us moving though our environment time sixty times as fast as it moves only one division. It will see us three thousand six hundred time as fast as a full circle or see's us eighty six thousand four hundred times as fast in a whole day.  In other words we are moving though our environment's time eighty six thousand four hundred times as fast as the hour hand does.

Operating on the principle when superman hits his breaks he observes the environment's time begin to speed up again because he is slowing down. As the slower he goes the faster the environments second stretches the faster the environment observers get faster and and faster the slower he comes to a complete stop. At a complete stop he would find himself a second in the future he left a hundred and sixty kilometers away. In other words the slower we go the faster time speeds up. 

If this is a example of what happens when we slow down to a stop from a hundred and sixty kilometers distance than there is no reason why not the same thing should happen accelerating the distance of a light second to a stop in a second.

No comments: