Alternative erath's Temperal mechanics Mars, earth Issac Nwtown Albert Eienstien

Previously I saw a Utube clip about what it would be like if the earth stopped spinning. I'd spotted in the side bar a title can the earth survive with out the moon promising myself I'll get to that when I'd finished with this clip.

In this follow up I was disappointed the clip rambled on I had already read lots about hundreds of thousands of times already. I checked similar sites pretty much the same with a consistent impression life depends on the moon though. It sounded like to me life evolved round it. What if it's not the case of the former question in the present tense but in the past tense of what would the earth be like today if the moon didn't exist when life began.

All the clips had a consistent theme Mars ( as well as the other planets ) frequently referenced in relation to the earth's moon. I never gave any thought to any Mars moons until a segment in a clip apparently there is none. All the clips referenced back to earth the earth's spin wobble being stable. According to comparing the two planets evidence the orbiting masses ( or gravities of moons if you like ) stabilize planetary spin wobbles.

Maybe I'm taking the definition of stable to the extreme literary. Observing the illustration of Mars's wobble I thought relatively under stable control between a maximum and minimum angles range, not like any out of control chaotic wobbling I've ever seen.

I'd had leant a lot from reading consistent the earth has a tilt and as well as a slight wobble. According to this segment Mars without a moon it's wobble was quite significant but the earth with a moon appears to have a dampening effect on the earth's wobble.

I thought even  with Mars wobble with a significant frequency  was significantly stable. The wobble wasn't variable. I used the though experiment of measuring a planetary wobble so I could be clear on this.

Lets assume a thirty and sixty degree angle range on a typical half circle protractor. Imagine an apple,  the cores at each end representing the North and south poles of any star or Planet with a spike right though the center to represent an axis. We can line up the spike to thirty degree and move back and forth between sixty and thirty. In the clip segment. It seemed clear to me one of the rolls of the moon today is help dampen ( or slow down ) the earth's wobble. Maybe the earth's spin too. 

The fact remains Mars has a stable wobble frequency to it's wobble despite no water life and no moon, and in addition to a consistent belief not enough mass to hold onto a suitable atmosphere. I an reminded of an entanglement theory of temporal mechanics, ( many worlds,  or parallel universe theory ), in  Quantum physics ( also known by the terms  Quantum mechanics, Quantum theory )  there are alternate worlds in the universe including alternate earth's with no moon to this day. Theoretically  if Mars had the mass to hold onto an atmosphere life may have evolved round the stable wobble as much as life on earth may have evolved round the earth's moon's dampening effect on the wobble of our earth.

A saw a DVD the power of the earth that was quite enlightening. Several billion years ago the earth went though a particularly tough ice age called Snow ball earth. It was enlightening to a extent volcanic eruptions spewing massive amounts of carbon dioxide warmed up earth saving it from every warming up again. If anything temporal mechanics has tough me it is possible anything can happen including on an alternate earth these volcanic eruptions during the same snow ball era could easily have been different,  not frequent and strong enough and dying out leaving an the alternate earth permanently frozen hell to this day.

According to the power of the earth video there are heat forces at work deep in the bowls of the earth a contributing factor to life on earth to exist. The momentum forces of motion reminds me of Isaac Newtown and Albert Einstein's theories of motion pretty much parallel with one another. One of Newton's laws that comes to mind where there is a force there is an equal and opposite force pushing back. Albert Einstein pretty well much summed it occurs in motion described in a elevator motion in his special theory of relativity as a gravitational equivalence equal to feeling weighed down we feel in severe accelerations we express as G's we all know well in Rolla coaster rides. 

Einstein's special theory tells us  at take offs we experience as if several kilograms weighing us down into our seats in a equal force as the acceleration. Coming to a stop from high rates of speed a force equally pulls us forward in equal force as the braking. It has been confirmed in a few video clips and reading a what I suspected for a long time one G  equivalent of the earth's gravity the scientific term nine point eight Newton's, considered the unit of the strength of the earth's gravity equivalent of a pressure of a kilogram per square meter, ( or ponds per square inch if you like ), at sea level. The maximum G's of a Rolla caster is said to be four G's, four times that of the earth's gravity. Drag race car and boat driver expedience more G's then any any Rolla coaster. The sodden stops in crash misshapes go up up as much as ten G's.

Operating on the principle theoretically there should be G's on planetary scales even galaxies. I'm thinking of the momentum of orbit and spin of Planets. According to  Einstein's special theory elevator gravitational equivalence the velocity of the earth's orbit round the sun should be adding mass to the mass of the earth. But the moon is not spinning the same face always towards the earth helps to dispel the theory. 

In terms of tones ( or tons if you like ) the mass of earth is believed to be the equivalent of about eighteen trillion or so. According to Einstein's General theory bends space equivalent to a tone per square kilometer thou out  the total earth's surface. ( Or in tons per mile square mile if you like ). Space is a depth away and behind us disappearing into infinity in every direction. According to Einstein's General theory mass shrinks space round the entire circumference of a body. In the case of the earth the south pole is bending space as equally and the north. In fact your own back yard as much as the back yards of the countries on the opposite side of the world is. Gravity is defined as a collapse of space round a body due to mass.

The moon being a sixth the size of earth the collapse of space round it is equally a sixth of the earth's power. If we do the arithmetic on this, a scale reading a kilogram mass on earth will read the same mass a hundred and sixty six grams lighter on the moon  an eight hundred and eighty four grams reading. In out of space will read nothing. The scale would be crushed by it's own weight let a lone several kilograms of the same mass on the surface of Jupiter  and the sun's mass would crush it and the same mass under several tones. In other words the same mass weighs differently in different gravities.   

According to Newton and Einstein's special theory of reality stars and planets should have a force in their momentum's.  It was believed the moon was created this way. To illustrate this the earth was hit by a several trillion tone mass the size of Mars traveling at a top speed of several tens of thousand of kilometers an hour ( or miles an hour if you like ) of force. Earth may have had a different orbit and spin at the time, and believed to be much smaller which has a significance bearing to this point.

Upon impact the earth acted as an  immovable object up against an unstoppable velocity of the body the earth refusing to be shifted out of orbit. It was a case of a titanic struggle between the two titanic forces the earth refusing to yelled to an unstoppable force equally the unstoppable force refusing to yelled to the immovable object.

As the body hit, the earth refusing to budge the body was equally stubborn refusing to even be slowed down. It never reduced it's speed. As the opposing forces fought each other, the body buried itself into the earth the earth still refused to be moved. The heat and energy generated rivaled that of the sun itself the body still traveling full speed welding and stoving itself into the earth the earth still refusing to be budged from orbit. By now many of you would be having thoughts talk about an immovable object up against an unstoppable force. Refusing to be slowed shattered into millions molten debris the continuing velocities never slowing down.

It is believed the earth became much bigger ( gained mass ) larger than the escape velocity required for the remaining debris trapping them in orbit. As time went by the orbiting debris colliding with each other gradually collected together forming the mass of the moon still orbiting earth to this day. If it is true the earth gained mass today's moon is a direct result of a bigger earth that could then hold onto the future atmosphere.

It is said to explain why Mars is so barren today it's mass is to small to hold onto any atmosphere. If that is anything to go by dispute earth being in the right boundary orbit from the sun to support temporal mechanics tells an alternative to small to have held onto an atmosphere. If this is anything to go by another temporal mechanics says the event that created the moon never took place. If the right distance from the sun supported life did and no moon life on this alternate earth would be very different to our earth.