We can become pretty good at measuring the the distance we walk a meter. Our brain can judge the distance we walk in time. Operating on the principle we can do this judging the distance of a meter while we walk saying "One thousand and one". In doing so we measured a meter in a second. If we continually walk a meter per second. By that time in the vacuum of space light had traveled a distance of just under 300 million meters ( 297 million 958 thousand and 950 to be exact or 297,958.95 kilometers ).
The moon is less than a couple of light seconds away. The nearest star ( our sun ) is 8 light minutes. We are observing the sun as it was 8 minutes ago every second meaning we won't observe the light that just left now 8 minutes into the future.
Motor sport commentators win and loose our heroes in fractions of a second testifying it is measured. The standard system metric prefix milli ( mill lee ) for a thousandth tells us 750 is three quarter second, 666 is two thirds, 500 is a half, 333 is one third and 250 is a quarter. Mathematics tells us the simple rule 3 dived 4, 2 divide 3, 1 divide 2, 1 divide 4 or 1 divide 8, 1 divide 16, 32 a 100 right down to a 1,000.a millisecond.
A millionth of a second is a microsecond the latter of a millisecond in microsecond units. The reciprocal of a any number is 1 dived the same number light speed no exception were the 3 of 300,000km relocated to right of the 0's giving us 300,000th second ( or 3microseconds ) light travels when we walk a meter in a second. ( 3us/m ) Notice the fraction is a minus of the same number in the positives value. In other words reciprocals of each other.
Light obeys Isaac Newton's first law of motion in any vacuum. Take a body lunched in space for example. At first they accelerates but stop accelerating to a maximum momentum speed limit. Mathematics tells us there should be no speed limit where there is no resistance. Yet acceleration is terminated to a constant velocity where the body doesn't go any faster and light is no exception.
We observe a light second a fixed distance every second. Despite no resistance it does not travel the distance any faster. The distance of a light second is ahead of us into the future by the end of every second. If we travel faster than a clock we would be traveling in a shorter distance in the same time closer to light speed's fixed maximum.
Most of us believe time stops when we travel at light speed. The reciprocal tells us from light speeds point of view the universe should appear to slow down as slow as 300,000 seconds to travel the same distance we normally view light speed would do in a second. ( In other words from light speed's point of view the universe travels 300,000 seconds per 300,000 kilometers ). Anybody into mathematics will agree 3 kilometers per second roughly a long weekend to travel the same distance we normally view light in second. Light being a constant distance the reciprocal shows if we view the universe from a light speed point of view we should never observe the distance move any slower. Time stopped doesn't exist only moving to slow can't observe moving looking like it stopped
The faster we travel a distance the slower time goes. Eventually we can't observe moving any at all when we reach the maximum distance we normally observe light travel in a second. Take the minute and hour hands of analogue clocks for example.
We observed these frozen in time at any given moment but we can observe the second hand moving. Clock faces are divided into 60 second divisions so by the time we observe the second hand move a full circle we don't observe the stationary minute hand move a division. So too, we observe the hour hand stationary as it moves round the clock face.
If we do the math's on this an hour is 3,600 times as slow as every second and every minute by 60 times. Every second light travels distance of 300,000km in a one hour TV program equal to the total distance traveled in that time. Math's can't lie you know. It tells us observed time can't be any slower than the reciprocal of light speed.
Every twelve midnight is a date change from one day to the next. The hour hand appears stationary to us but every time we look at it but moves twice round the clock, one for a.m. and the other for p.m every time the date changes for every day. If we do the math's on this equals to 86,400 seconds. The reciprocal tells us every second is 86,400th of a day meaning a day is made up of 86,400 second increment times.
Adding up the seconds of a week ( The first second 12 midnight Monday morning to the last second 12 midnight Sunday night ) is that much slower than a single second. The same if we add up all the seconds of each month. However a total of a year can be projected by multiplying all the days of a year by all the seconds of a day.
When we take into account of the extra day at the end of every fourth February leap year we can project all the seconds of a decade, a Century, a millennia ( a thousand years), a million, billion even trillions of centuries and beyond.
We are reminded of the light of the first stars since the big bang that has supposed to have created the universe so long ago around 14 billion years give or take a few million. The first Light of the universe is still traveling since.
Imagine there was no speed limit. Lets say we accelerate 10 times the distance every second 0 to 1 meter as the first second. By the end of the second we would have traveled 10 meters. By the end of the 3rd second we'd traveled a 100m and by the end of the 4th second we'd be a 1,000m.Since there is a 1,000 in a kilometer we'd traveled a kilometer in 4 seconds flat. 1m in a second, 10m in 2 seconds, 100m, in 3 seconds and a 1,000m in 4 seconds.
By the end of 5 seconds we'd traveled 10km. By the end of 6 seconds we traveled a100km and by the end of the 7th we be a 1,000km. By the end of 8 seconds we'd be 10,000km. By the end of 9 we'd traveled a100,000km and by the end of 10 seconds we'd traveled a 1,000,000 ( million ) km.
By the end of 11seconds we'd traveled 10,000,000km. ( 10 million ). By the end of 12 seconds we traveled a 100,000,000 ( a 100 million ) and by the end of 13 seconds we'd traveled a1,000,000,000.( a thousand million ).
By the end of 14 seconds we'd be 10,000.000,000 ( ten thousand million ). By 15 seconds ( a quarter minute ) we'd traveled a distance of a 100 thousand million kilometers. Imagine the distance at this rate by a half minute let a alone a full minute, let a lone in every second of an hour, every second for days, weeks, months, years, decades, centuries, millennia, millions of years, billions, trillions even in trillions of centuries with no end in sight of the acceleration.
We are reminded the time of the first second of the big bang to present day is not even close to a trillion years old let a lone a few trillion centuries. Never the less mathematics says there is no reason way not the universe can reach as old as a few dozen trillion mellinnener and beyond which is to say no where near any anything infinite.
0 to a distance of a160km (100 miles ) in a second illustrates time doesn't necessarily stop at light speed. We accelerate to 80km in half a second and decelerate to a stop in another 80km in half second. From the environment's point of view we disappeared and reappeared a160km away in a second. Or alternatively we'd stretch a 160km distance like a rubber band snapping back to normal in a second.
But from our point of view as we sped up 80km the environment's time may slowly at first began to be longer and longer to travel 80k distance to a point it took a second and more. It gets longer and longer the closer we get.
It may come to a point where the environment's second is so long we don't see the environment moving any more. Then as we hit the brakes the environment begins to move in the forward direction picking up speed As we slow down, slowly at first the 80km got faster and faster to travel until we found ourselves a second into the future a160km away where we started. Time not only slows down the faster we go ,eventually when we have to slow down to stop it has to also speed up as the slower we go.
Given the circumference of the earth mathematics projects light speed travels round it just over 7 times in a second. From the environment's point of view 300,000 times as fast as the environment second. So if we were to view the world 7 times round the earth in a second velocity the environment's time would appear to slow down 300,000 seconds times as slow. We could observe the second hand of a clock move one division as we traveled the 7 times round the world. Anybody good at math's should be able to work out the time once round the earth.
If we travel round the earth's circumference where we observe the second hand slowed down we normally observe the minute hand we'd be 60 times as fast as the environment second. While we are a minute in the future every second we would observe every environment second slowed down by a minute. At this point we observe the environment's time seem to be frozen. But if we view an office full of people on a hot day we world observe motionless yet desk fans seem top be slowly turning as if staved of power. Time is not stopped only people moving to slow to see moving.
If we observe the second hand slowed down we'd normally observe the hour hand move we'd be 3,600 times as fast or an hour into the future every environment second.
The same would apply if we were to observe the second hand as still as the hour hand moving twice round the clock face every date change. If we add up all the seconds we'd be 86,400 times faster than the environment second, or a hour into the future every environment second. From our point of view the environment's second is slowed down by an hour. Anybody into math's would agree if every environment second is slowed down by an hours it will take more than several of month's for an environment day to pass.
We would observe the dusk and dawns of each day last 86,400 times longer than we normally do. Imagine how slow we'd observe every environment second all the seconds of a week, a month. Imagine a year into the environment future every second, let a lone, a decade, a millennia and beyond.
Traveling faster than the environment's second would observe the slowdown consequences of mother nature. For example the normal electromagnetic radiation in the environment would appear to be effected. For example in the normal circumstances the mains electric power alternates from minimum to maximum in an alternating current flow 60 times a second. Hertz is the unit of one cycle. The mains lighting throbs from minimum to maximum to minimum brightness 60 times a second. It is so fast to us appears to be a steady light source.
If we travel faster than the environment's second by the same amount we'd be in parallel with 60th environment second which means in parallel with a single alternating cycle. In other words a minute into the future every environment second we'd observe the mains lighting as 1Hz. All lighting would throb from minimum to maximum to minimum brightness once every second. Observing a electrical storm we would observe a lightening strike slowed down by 60 times.
Not only that but the cosmic radiation from the sun such as the ultra violet light ( UV ) rays filtering though our atmosphere that tans our skin in the summer months when we sun bath on beaches. Mega from from the standard metric system prefix unit system for a million puts the energy well beyond several 100 MegaHz. ( MHz ). A minute into the future every second this UV radiation from our sun would be 60 times lower in frequency. It would become radiation of several kilohertz. (Kilo for a thousand. KHz ).
The colors of the environment would also be different. Red is the lowest frequency we can see in nature while blue is the highest where all other frequencies above blue ( Ultra violet light ) and bellow red ( inferred ) where the fluency is so high or so low is invisible making up a total cosmic radiation of the universe. The wavelengths range from a kilometer long to hundreds of times as short as a human hair.
The lower the observe frequency the redder the environment will appear. The frost of frosted light bulbs lowers the electrical frequency giving a hint of a yellow color cast. The normal blue sky would look redder and all the florescent and the frosted light bulbs will look a red color cast in the environment by the amount we are faster than the environment second. We would be observing the environments color temperatures much lower in frequencies. Red would look missing while all colors would look more redder than normal by the amount including white vehicle paint to green foliage.
Traveling faster than the environment's second has it's traveling a shorter distance faster in the same time second we normal observe has it's inverted viewing of the environment's time consequences.
So far traveling faster than the environment second we traveling at constant velocity. There is no change as we keep going indefinitely though the environment years and centuries without a slowdown of centimeter.
Most of us believe once we slowdown from light speed the environment's time goes backwards traveling back into the past. We are looking from our point of view of us but there is also the point of view of the environment's point of view. While appearing to have vanished into time we would be a minute in the forward direction second by second. Without slowing down we remain, a minute ahead indefinitely, days, weeks, month's, years and so forth.
As we come to a halt the environment's time should return to the normal forward direction. To do that the environment's time would have to come to a complete stop to start up as normal. Come back to the case of 0 to a distance of a 160km in a second where we found ourselves a160km away from where we started only a second in the future. We had reached a point where the environment's time was to slow to observe moving. To be only a second passed 160km where we started time never actually stopped only observed as restarted going in the forward direction.
If this is applied to light speed on paper at lest 300,000km is only figures. If it obeys the same law as we decelerate the environment's time appears to be going to slow to observe moving. As we hit the brakes it should start up in the forward direction untilled we find ourselves only a environment second had passed 300,000km away were we left off or about 7 times round the earth.
Some of us may argue such acceleration in the earth's atmosphere we would be incinerated in a fraction of the distance let a lone crushed by the "G's" 0 to a 160km in a second let a lone light speed. That would depends on the power of the acceleration . The fact is the faster we go the more the air becomes thicker. Eventually it would be like plowing though treacle to maintain the speed. Without the power behind the acceleration we'd be struggling to gain the required speed. With out enough force we would be wasting distance creeping agonizingly close but never actually reaching it.
If this is the case what's wrong with a vacuum? Everything because of the simple rule of maximum speed limits. Take a freefalling 1kg mass in the earth's atmosphere. With out it dropping the kilogram from a great height the earth's mass will will snatch it from 0 to a meter in a second and stop accelerating to a constant free fall velocity straight down to impact with the ground.
The acceleration was terminated called terminal acceleration better known as terminal velocity. If we do the math's on this equals a1kg, 3.6kmph impact with the immovable mass of the earth. For a second the falling mass was heavier than normal dissipating though it to normal rest as if the earth's was temporary bigger ion that time.
Acceleration weighs mass down to a point it can't accelerate any further better known to lay people as G-force for a straight line velocity. A case in point. If we lunch the 1kg in space it will accelerate 1,000's'kmph and stop accelerating to the constant velocity in the same second as a meter in the earth's gravity.
There is no atmosphere to burn it in space not even 0 to a160km distance in a second. In fact we will never feel the same acceleration in space as we do on the surface of earth. Imagine stepping out of a vehicle traveling only 1/2kmph compared to stepping out of a space station hatch orbiting high above the earth.
It takes light speed to feel any effect in space. The pressure is so great will crush the mass to atoms in a fraction of a second. Another case feeling the heat when pumping up a bicycle tire is not due to friction you know. Pressure produces heat. It is so great, equal to millions of digress centigrade every second. As you can see we will not escape the consequences of a velocity on a light speed scale even in a vacuum.
So what is the situation when we view the minute hand sped up we normally observe the second hand?
We would be traveling a dimension 60 times slower than the environment second. We would observe the the environment's time a minute in the future every second while the environment would observe us 60 times or a minute as slow. Correspondingly if we were an hour as slow from the environment point of view we would observe an environment hour pass every second. The same for a day, a week, a month, a year decades and years. Park statues observe a century pass in less than a second To ancient fossils millions of years the environment's time would not appear to exist at all.
The slower we go the faster time goes.
If we travel slower than a clock we would observe distance longer than we'd normally see a light second in the same second.
As we learnt from a reciprocal tells us from light speeds point of view the universe should appear to slow down as slow as 300,000 seconds to travel the same distance we normally view light speed in a second. Traveling a minute as slow as the environments second we would observe a minute ahead of the environment's observation of the universe every second. This can record artificially view of the concept the with a time lapse video capture of a starry night.
The environment observes us frozen in time at any given moment but we can observe the environment minute pass every second. We will observe the second hand spin 60 full circles in a second we observe the minute hand move a division while the hour hand appears stationary.
The hour hand still appears stationary but every time we look at it has moved a division we'd observe the minute hand, one for a.m. and the other for p.m every time the date changes for every day. We observe the environment hour 60 times faster. If we do the math's on this equals telling us every second is3,600th of a day of a day faster of a day.
If we observe the hour hand as fast as we'd normally view the second hand we'd be 86,400 times slower than the environment second. Correspondingly we'd view every environment hour 86,400 times as fast. So to every every hour in every day week ,month, year, decade, millennia, millions, billions and trillions of years would pass that fast per second. Anybody into mathematics should be able to work out how long it would take the equivalent to travel a trillion environment centuries.
Adding up the seconds of a week we would be that much slower than the environment second at observing a week per second. The same if we add up all the seconds of each month. As we learnt earlier all the seconds of a year will projected how many times slower than the environment's second observing a environment year per second velocity. From the environment's point of view would observe us frozen in time every year, year after year for many years.
As we learnt earlier taking into account of leaps we can project all the seconds of a decade, a Century, a millennia, a million, billion even trillions of centuries and beyond we would be as slows every environment second viewing the reciprocals the environment's time passes every second.
Imagine observing a trillion environment centuries pass every second because from the environment point of view we would be frozen in time for a trillion centuries at a time. This would indeed would be what a park statue would observe of every day for a trillion centuries of the world round it.
II reminded you of the light of the first stars since the big bang around 14 billion years give or take a few million. The first Light of the universe is still traveling though since.
Imagine again there was no speed limit but this time slowness. Lets say we decelerate 10 times the distance every second 0 to 1 meter as the first second. We would view every environment second increase faster and faster every second.
As I said earlier the time of the first second of the big bang to present day is not even close to a trillion years let a lone a few trillion centuries. Again we can conclude mathematics says there is no reason way not the universe can reach as old as a few dozen trillion mellinnener and beyond in a second.
As 0 to a distance of a160km (100 miles ) in a second illustrated it has to come to a point where the environment's second is so short time will seem out of control. As we speed up, slowly at first the environment's time slows down faster and faster we accelerate until we found ourselves a second in normal time. Time not only speeds up as the slower we go ,eventually when we have to speed up the faster we go the slower time goes.
We learnt earlier given the circumference of the earth mathematics projects light speed travels round it just over 7 times in a environment second. If we slowed down to light speed we would observe every environment second 300,000 times as fast while the environment will observe us 300,000 times as slow. Any body curious enough some math's initiative should be able to work out some scenarios of one rotation point of view of us of the environment and the environment of us.
If we view an office full of people they world look racing round 60 times as fast as we would observe normally while we would be moving to slow for them to see us move during each minute. If we observe the the minute hand of a clock it would move as fast as we'd normally observe the second hand. Math's projects the second hand would spin a whole circle in a second, or 60 in a minute an environment hour every minute.
In one hour would complete from the first second 12 midnight to the first second 12 midday. Another for the afternoon to the last second 12 midnight. In other words 12 environment hours per one hour or two hours for every date change. In other words a 24 hours compressed into the time of an average movie length.
If we add up all the seconds of a day from the environment's point of view we'd be 86,400 times or a day slower than the environment second, or from our point point of view at lest a date change every hour. In other words every environment 12 midnight to12miday and 12 midday to12 midnight every every a piece or a whole 24 hours in an half hour.
We would observe the dusk and dawns of each day last 86,400 times faster than we normal imagine Imagine how fast we'd observe every environment second slowed down the same amount all the seconds of a day, Anybody into math's day today dates changes in mere seconds. 60 days in an hour. That would mean 60 years in a day let a lone, all the seconds in a day traveling for in a week, a month, in a year, a decade, a millennia and beyond.
Traveling slower than the environment's second we would observe the speeded up consequences of mother nature. For example the normal electromagnetic radiation in the environment would appear to be effected. Observing a minute pass every second the AC of the mains would be increased by 60 times faster as it would normally be. The mains would be like a 3.6kHz radiation.
From the environment's point of view we travel slower than the environment's second by the same amount. From our point of view all lighting would throb from minimum to maximum to minimum brightness 3,600 times per every minute
More dramatically the cosmic radiation from the sun. A minute as slow as the environments second into the UV radiation be 60 times higher. It would become radiation of several MHz more powerful because our metabolism would be on a different dimension equally slow by the same amount.
The colors of the environment would also be different. We learnt red the lowest frequency we can see in while blue is the highest where all the red will turn in blue where the fluencies will be so high we will there will be no more inferred as it is change in to the colors we can now see.
The slower we go the more of inferred becomes the colors we normally observe. Fore example instead of the heat we can't normally see in a steamy kitchen would be the full of the higher frequency colors. The frost of frosted light bulbs would display blackness because there will be frequencies way way beyond we can see. The normal blue sky in board daylight would look black to. We would be observing the environments color temperatures much high in frequency too. Colors would look missing while all colors would look blue than normal by the amount including white vehicle paint to green foliage. Traveling slower than the environment's second distances will be longer in the same time time
As we leant earlier once we slowdown from light speed the environment's time doesn't go backwards traveling back into the past. Even going traveling slower than the environment's we are looking from our point of view of us but there is also the point of view of the environment's point of view. While appear as still as a statue we would be still moving in the forward diction every second of every minute. Without speeding back up we will remain, a minute ahead indefinitely, days, weeks, month's, years and so forth.
As we sped back up we come to a point where the environment's time is to slow slow to observe moving. The environment second is no longer short as it was. Without a power behind us to accelerate back up to speed we'd be struggling to gain the required speed. With out enough force we would probably be permanently stuck in the momentum.
It was pointed out some of us may argue high acceleration in the earth's atmosphere resistance should incinerated us in a fraction of the distance traveled let a lone crushed by the "G's" that depended on the acceleration. It is inevitable the air molecules would behave differently in our lungs. The slower we we go the more the particles will be more energetic suffocating us.
If this is the case what's wrong with a vacuum? Everything because of the simple rule of maximum speed limits learning about terminal acceleration known as terminal velocity. As far as anybody knows the reciprocal of light speed telling us the fastest the current time is the slowest we can travel. Nothing can travel any slower unless there is a faster than light speed.
As we learnt acceleration weighs mass down to a point it can't accelerate any further The same may apply preventing us from going any slower than our current dimension.
No comments:
Post a Comment