When we study Albert Einstein's theory of relativity we are studying motion on a light speed scale. Light speed is not just the relative velocity per second but equally relative to the distance. It travels just under 300 thousand km by the time we say "one thousand and one". This is the time we walk a meter, the second hand of analogue clocks and stop watches move a division and the pause in every second of digit time pieces. In fact light is always 300 thousand kilmeters ahead into the future of us every second.

The relative distance of the moon we observe the reflecting light a delay of a few seconds every second. Other factors tell us despite the zero resistance of space and light though of as weightless (no mass) is a maximum speed limit. It doesn't go any faster no doubt by the velocity so great it is weighed down to a point acceleration is terminated to a the maximum speed limit.

Einstein's theory comes in two papers the 1905 special theory and the General theory during the second year of world war one. The general was an after thought of the special, investigating variations of speed , twisting and turning that had morphed into the theory of the mass of stars and planets bending space derived from the special theory telling us motion has a G-force (Gravity forces) property we are all familiar with in high speed velocity. A case in point of an average family car.

They can generate 0 to 80kmph of G-force acceleration less than a few kilograms weighing us back into our seats in several seconds easily, powerful drag cars in less than a couple of seconds. A kilogram is not much just the weight we feel when we handle a1kg of cheese.

Rolla Casters generate it accelerating head long down hills and hitting tight bends with out slowing down. The twisting and turning motion at high velocity was the general idea of Einstein's general theory. As Rolla Coasters hit tight bends the cars attempt to obey Newton's laws of force and motion in a straight line. The end result is the weight we feel every time the car curves at high speed. The twisting and turning on a light speed scale is what gave cause for the general theory light speed scale G-forces distort space.

Einstein had in effect predicted the effect NASA has been using today using aircraft training astronauts in weightless. When a plane drops from high altitude at high speed it generates zero gravity where astronauts frolic about in weightless fun. In other words the motion of the aircraft becomes an antigravity device. If the plane climbs fast enough astronauts will feel as if a heavier gravity pulling them to the floor.

Einstein had predicted the implications if inertia at light speed. The special theory tells us we need more and more energy until we need an infinite amount to over come the resistance of the G-force. If a infinite amount of energy required for light speed is true, than at light speed has an infinite G-force property preventing light speed travel. And there is another special circumstance.

As Isaac Newton pointed out body's have a resistance to move called inertia. Einstein saw pushing the envelope a body to light speed would require and infinite amount of energy to over come the infinite amount of G-force pulling it back. The "G's" would certainly rival the gravitational filed of a black hole. After all, if light travels just under 300 thousand km/s ( or 10 thousand and 80 million kilometers per hour in kmph terms), so you can imagine the "G's" accelerating 0 to that velocity in a second. We don't have to be Einstein's to realize the implications.

Another factor involved with light speed any school physics class tells us compression heats. Just feel the heat of a bicycle pump when pumping air into a tire. It is not due to friction you know. You are compressing the air we breath into the confined space of the pump going into the tire. It is how diesel engines work as they rely on compression to ignite the fuel not petrol engine spark plugs.

At light speed velocity the G-force would compress the molecules crushing the body. The outer orbiting particles of the atoms (electrons) in each molecule would be pulled in closer to each other. Each part of the atom would become very heavy under the stress of the enormous G-force. Traveling towards light speed the body would get heavier and heavier and hotter and hotter from the pressure. The faster we go the more the atomic structure is crushed together. Sounds familiar to the gravitational field of collapsing matter reaching temperatures high enough to ignite into a star. Einstein pointed out in his special theory this G-force has the properties of distorting space and time the same properties developed the General theory as the mass of stars and planets.

The distortion of space effects length and time. We take for granted the second. Actually it is longer we think. It is by time we say we say "One thousand and one" the second hand of a clock moves a division, we walk a meter and light travels a distance of just under 300 thousand kilometers for example. This time we say "one thousand and one", tells us a 0 is the start of the second and 1 the end. As for the 2nd second is the start of the second and ends when the 3rd second starts. So for every second thereafter. Every time digital time piece second pauses or the second hand of a analogues clock moves a division is the length of time we say one thousand and one the end of every second is the start of another.

Operating on the principle we can slow time concentrating on observing the time delay of every digital time piece second and the movement of each division of analogue clock. I bet that would be the longest minute you'll ever site though.

By the time the second hand had moved a full circle the minute hand only moved a division Every second is 0 minuets. For example 12 midnight equals 00:00:00, and one second after 01:0:00 and count down to it is 00:1:0:00, the first minute of the first hour of the A.M). And too, when the minute hand of an analogue clock moves a full circle the hour hand had only moved a division.

From the point of view of the second hand the minute hand is 60 times as slow. With some math's statistics, shows the hour hand is 60 times as slow as as the minute hand, the hour hand 3 thousand 600 times as slow as the second hand respectively.

If we open out a analogue clock circle to a straight line the second is moving though a 60 division scale in a straight line every second or 60 in a minute. And too, we observe the minute and hour hand movement as frozen in time at any given moment. In other words they are to slow to observe moving. From the point of view point of the minute and hour hands they must observe us sped up in time by equal amounts all our activities.

In the general theory G-force on a light speed scale weight's heavily as a black hole. The only difference the gravitational filed of a black hole is stationary while light is motion. The slower we go the faster time goes for example if we observe the minute hand of a clock sped up we'd normally observe the second hand.

Operating on the principle the faster we travel the slower time goes to observe the environment's time to speed up, either the environment is traveling faster than us or we travel slower than the environment. Mathematics projects if we observe the minute hand sped up we'd normally observe the second hand since there are 60 seconds in a minute we would be 60 times as slow as every environment second. In other words the reciprocal tells we'd be traveling in parallel with 60th second dimension so from our point of view we observe every environment minute per second.

From the environment's point of view we would be stationary as statue in every minute. Clock faces point out as there is 60 minutes in an hour so environmental observers observing us as would see us move 60 times as slow as a second (a minute as slow) while we'd observe every environment second, a minute and every environment minute an hour into the future.

Particularly motor sport commentary commentators win and loose our motor sport heroes in less than a second. The standard metric system prefix units, mili (mill lee) for a thousandth and micro for a millionth is commonly used. The definition of the units tells us 0.75, (750 milliseconds) is three quarters, 0.66666.... .(666.6666.... milliseconds) is two thirds, 0.5, (500 milliseconds) is a half, 0.3333...... 333.33333.... milliseconds) is a third, 0.25 (250 milliseconds ) is a quarter respectively. Even smaller prefix units Nano- for a thousand millionth and pico- for a billionth is often encountered in science as small as several trillionths second. (A trillionths is an 18 decimal number). There are numbers as small as 25 decimal numbers of a second of time.

As every 12 midnight is a date change from one day to the next the hour hand moves two full circles one for A.M. and the other exactly the same amount of time for P.M. If we add up all the seconds amounts to 86 thousand 400 seconds. Every second starting at 0 second when the date changes to just before it change again is accounted for by both the second hand of analogue and digital time pieces. The reciprocal tells us every second is 86 thousand 400th of time of every date change.

If we observe the hour hand sped up we normally observe the second hand we'd be an hour as slow as the environment or 3 thousand 600 times as slow as the environment second observing the environment hour every second. Mathematics projects to observe a date change per second the hour hand makes a full circle every half second equal 2 by the time we" say one thousand a one" equal to being 86 thousand 400 times as slow as every environment second.

Mathematics projects If we add up all the seconds of a week (the first second 12 midnight Monday morning to the last 12 Midnight Sunday night) gives us the number of times as slow as the environment second we'd observe a environment week per second. Of course from the environment's point of view we'd be as still as a statue every week.

The same would apply to all the seconds of each month according to the western calendar. However if we take all the seconds of each date change multiplied by in a year will give us all the seconds of a year, from the first 12 midnight New years morning to the last 12 midnight new years eve. The same will apply if we take into account of the extra day at the end of every 4th February leap year, will apply for a decade. And so we can add up all the seconds of a century, a millennia (thousand years) a million, a billion, or even trillions of centuries respectively as slow as the environment second. With all said and done from one point of view a second stretched as long as a century and from the opposite point of view century compressed into a second respectively.

Our time frame is determined by the "time we say one thousand and one" determining from our point of view the distance light travels. Operating on the principle the information light takes just under eight minutes to reach earth from the sun, our sun is the nearest star eight light minutes away.

The law of mathematics' may sound confusing resulting in four equations if you can remember a light second times eight minutes equals the distance and eight minutes times the light second equals the distance. We can apply the distance dived a light second gives eight minutes and the distance divide the eight minutes equals the light second respectively. Mathematics can't lie you know. Distance equals light second, eight minutes, distance equals eight minutes, light second, equals distance over eight minutes and eight minutes equals distance over light second.

Light has been traveling the universe since the first light from the first second of the big bang that has supposed to have created the universe. So far, granted the earth traveling in motion though space, the first light is still traveling lighting up a path in a black void of empty space just under 15 billion years ahead of earth's position.

If we traveler quarter light speed we should be traveling quarter closer to it. At half, we would be half closer. If we travel three quarters we'd be three quarters closer. If we where 90 percent light we'd be 90 percent closer. Current thinking tells us no matter how much closer we are to light speed light would always be the exact light speed ahead of us every second.

Consider if we to resort to some math's commutations a quarter light speed light would be 750 thousand km/s ahead of us every second. If half light speed would be 150 thousand. If three quarters would be 225 thousand km/s. If 90 percent light speed would be 30 thousand km/s ahead of us. Math's doesn't lie only our current thinking disagrees.

Consider for example if we were at light speed. Theoretically we would be traveling in parallel with it. Mathematically light speed is no (or 0) km/s. Our current thinking light speed is a constant should not change suggesting it should appear to look stationary to us. If we were to stick to our current idea light is always ahead of us by light speed no matter how fast we travel says light would be the same velocity ahead of us every second. To agree mathematically traveling 300 thousand km/s light speed would need to be a total 600 thousand km/s. Otherwise light speed we would never reach beyond in parallel with it.

Mathematically speaking tells us if light is a a light second head of us every second then it stands to reason the distance in every second. At a quarter, half, 3 quarters or 90 percent light speed we close those distances in each second.

So if on light speed from our point of view at lest would be traveling 0 meters relative to us. Country to the belief the faster we go the slower time goes we should observe the universe travel at light speed. But from the the universe's point of view we would be traveling at a light speed velocity though space and time. From our point of view equally the universe country to looking slowed down in time.

If the faster we go the slower times slows down is true we may think we'd observe the universe slowed down by the same amount as the light speed value we'd normally observe light speed. For example mathematics tells us means if we apply the reciprocal translates to observing the universe 300 thousand seconds to travel a distance of 300 thousand km. If we do the math's on this from a light speed point of view the universe should appear to take a good proportion of a long weekend to cover the same distance we'd normally observe in a second or 3 thousand km/s.

But as Einstein's special theory tells us distance is compressed the faster we go. If light speed is a constant as it is believed to be has to be directly related to the faster we go the less distance to light's maximum limit. The closer and closer we get the more the distance is compressed up against the unchanged constant until we are traveling the same speed where there should be zero meters.

In other words we will be squeezed by the pressure of the closed distance every second. The G-force at light at speed is at maximum. Catching up with the constant flies in the face of no matter how fast we go light is always ahead of us were we can never catch up with it.

If on the other hand as we move closer to light speed's constant, we would experience the pressure of the continues compression. Every molecule would be compressed together with building heat. In many respects like being crushed falling into the boundary the void of a black hole. (Event horizon ) The closer we go the more the distance is closed the more compressed and hotter the body becomes. Operating on the principle the second would be totally squeezed to the value of light speed. In other words the distance of 300 thousand km and 1 second compressed by a factor of 300 thousand times.